Posts Tagged ‘Story climax’

Want What You Get

Monday, August 23rd, 2010

eckhart

I know this sounds crazy but…is Eckhart Tolle e-stalking me?

It seems that every time I compose a dispatch, I find that E.T. has been visiting my in-box. Most recently, I was making notes for a blog post on a talk I’m giving soon about ‘The Nascent Self’ with respect to fiction.

[nascent, adjective: coming into being, emerging]

Regular visitors to my blog will be familiar with my theories—that any story can be divided into two—before and after the protagonist has exhausted all her options. I would appear to be making a hobby out of putting that moment under a microscope to see ever more deeply into what exactly is happening during that personal crisis.

Fictional heroes are all about Desire. It’s desire that sets them off on the adventure, and it’s desire that gets them deep into trouble. But it’s clear that some kind of awakening occurs during their crisis, and a rearranging of priorities. I don’t know of a single literary critic who speaks of this phenomenon. Mr. Tolle, however, seems to have his finger on drama’s pulse:

“When you drop your expectations that a person, a situation, a place, or an object should fulfill you, it’s easier to be present in this moment because you’re no longer looking to the next one. Most people want to get what they want, whereas the secret is to want what you get at this moment.”

Excuse me but…isn’t that it exactly? In any story worth reading, the protagonist doesn’t grind out a single straight path from desire to goal. The hero is usually so beat up or exhausted by this point in the story that he’s willing to reassess everything. And, so, a second goal invariably emerges. One that’s born in the crucible of higher awareness.

All the mystics offer the same key to freedom and true victory:

Want what you’re getting in this very moment.

These emails I’m getting from the mystic in my midst…well, I want more!

Thank you, Eckhart Tolle

Tuesday, June 8th, 2010

With whatever spontaneous action arises out of presence,
an intelligence is then at work in the situation.

Whatever the situation, that intelligence is far greater
than the intelligence of the thinking mind.

Sounds like my theme of the last few months, doesn’t it?

At the major crisis of most films and novels, the protagonist gives up her thinking mind. I’ve often deferred to the mystics to explain the fallout of ‘presence’ that descends upon characters who find themselves in a dramatic cul de sac. The above quote – discovered in my in-box this morning – points to some kind of ‘higher intelligence’. It comes from the e-desk of Eckhart Tolle.

I’m inclined now to see a story as a unity in just two parts. They are separated by that all-important moment of presence. Call part one: Complications. Call part two: Resolution. They are really two separate stories. Of course, they’re linked by unities of time and space. But mainly by the hero’s deepest and truest yearnings.

No one operates from depth until they have to. No one functions from truth unless their delusions fail to support their goals. The thinking mind is a miraculous realm of sophisticated delusions. It takes a protagonist very far indeed. In real life, it takes many people as far as they’ll ever go. But fiction is different.

Fiction is the realm of the extraordinary. It’s a place where characters persevere. Subconsciously, we the reader are willing to suffer any amount of painful complications as long as it delivers us to that moment of presence that opens us to our higher selves.

We want to experience the ‘greater intelligence’ that sweeps any good story to its resolution.

Stop!

Tuesday, May 18th, 2010
Stop!

Peace of mind…isn’t that an oxymoron? The mind is all busyness. Peace of mind is really a disengagement from the mind. This very disconnection, or stoppage of thought, is what I’ve been pointing to in recent posts. It would seem that writers instinctively force their protagonists to this mental ‘stop’, where flashes of insight descend upon them. Enough to see them through Act 3.

Let’s not make a rule out it, but it would appear to be a principle of story structure – that protagonists who win almost invariably experience a moment of ‘stop’ just prior to their victory battle. You can check it out for yourself by watching for it while reading novels and watching movies. The vigilance does nothing but heighten our enjoyment of fiction.

The ‘Stop!’ experience actually has a long history. In esoteric circles it’s a technique to free the mind from the habitual patterns that bind most people to utter predictability.

George Gurdjieff (1872-1949) required his pupils to Stop! in the midst of their daily activities. At the signal, you would freeze on the spot. While working in the kitchen or opening a door or lighting a cigarette, you held whatever position you found yourself in. Likewise feelings and emotions were to be fixed, which was virtually impossible, since the illusions that comprise our mind-made reality depend on a constantly moving stream of knee-jerk reactions to incoming stimuli. Gurdjieff’s practice was all in aid of freeing the mind to attain a more objective reality. 

In other words, the truth about things.

I don’t think everyone is guaranteed objective truth in this lifetime.  I think it takes some kind of heroic effort.  Does this explain our insatiable appetite for stories?

 

Gurdjieff and the Centre of Gravity

Sunday, May 2nd, 2010

If George Gurdjieff (see previous post) had been a screenwriter, he might have organized his plots around the story’s “centre of gravity”. Gurdjieff used that term with reference to his lectures. There’s no point in wasting time with details, he said, if the essence of his subject isn’t understood. Let’s – as writers and readers – consider this approach.

So, what is a story’s centre of gravity?

In Star Wars, it was the Dark Force, a centre of gravity that most certainly guided George Lucas through the development of his intergalactic tale. It’s almost always a ‘dark force’, that is to say, an aspect of the protagonist that he or she will avoid like the plague. It’s what heroes fear most. It defines their limits. So, naturally, that’s where the story is headed.

A story should take the protagonist to that very place where she has no experience in defending herself. It’s a place of emptiness, exhaustion, and dread. It’s only at this dead-end where the hero opens up to influences beyond her narrow, mind-made reality…and finds a way out.

As writers, we need to discover this crucial story element as soon as possible in the writing process. As readers, we get seduced into the story by our expectation that the protagonist will crash and burn into this personal void.

This week’s blog from Eckhart Tolle says it perfectly: “Creativity arises out of the state of thoughtless presence in which you are much more awake than when you are engrossed in thinking.”

Consider Loretta (Cher) in Moonstruck. I keep coming back to the Act Two crisis in this most perfect of films. Loretta has struggled throughout Acts One and Two to suppress her romantic nature because she’s soon to marry a dullard. But after the most romantic evening of her life (with her fiance’s brother), she has run out of defenses. She has come to a full stop. As the camera zooms slowly into her face, we see exactly what Gurdjieff and Tolle are talking about. We see the ‘thoughtless presence’ that exists at the ‘centre of gravity’.

Act Three finds the hero functioning in tune with her deeper nature for the first time. As in fiction, so in life – we have to come to a complete stop before resuming a life that’s in tune with the wider world.  

Until we know what it takes to bring our hero to that complete stop, all other story details are meaningless.

An Education

Saturday, April 10th, 2010

The unbearable consequences of being human – flawed, imperfect, shortsighted – this is what the Brit film, An Education is all about. What better vehicle to highlight human folly than a 17-year-old schoolgirl. The bright and talented Jenny is so hungry for worldly experience that she can hardly be expected to defend herself against the seductions of a cultured and charming older man. She’s so bored with her institutional education that the audience accepts the risks she faces in escaping into David’s grown-up world of art and music.

Even still, because this is a movie, we know that Jenny’s bubble has to burst. We know instinctively that it’s going to happen. We know that stories are designed to hang the heroine on the petard of her own desires. The three-act story formula always reduces the protagonist to a moment of stupefying self-awareness, something along the lines of, “I’m a complete idiot.”

Jenny had thought herself so wise – wiser by far than her teachers – and now at her humiliating epiphany she distrusts the conventions of her own mind. Who is she, now? What happens to a person when they are forced to accept their own limitations? (Who am I when I reject my own thoughts?)

It’s the premise of this blog that the crosscurrents of a life lived passionately lead inevitably to a glorious disillusionment. It’s a blissfully painful space generated by our rejection of the strategies that produced the crisis that is killing us. Mystics might call it a moment of pure being.

In An Education, Jenny comes to glimpse her appropriate place in the cosmos. What else can she say except, “Help me.” She has become a wiser person.

What the Mockingbird Proves

Tuesday, February 9th, 2010

After all these years, I finally got around to reading “To Kill a Mockingbird”, by Harper Lee. The book’s unique characters held me in thrall. Who would have thought to invent a character who (without religion) is all light and goodness? He serves to contrast the general level of bigotry that’s typical of our so-called “religious” society.

Here’s the book’s theme: “I’d rather you shot at tin cans in the back yard,” says Atticus, the young protagonist’s father, “but I know you’ll go after birds. Shoot all the bluejays you want, if you can hit ‘em, but remember it’s a sin to kill a mockingbird.”

The rationale for the mockingbird’s special status is explained by a neighbour: “They don’t do one thing but sing their heart out for us. That’s why it’s a sin to kill a mockingbird.”

Atticus is the only lawyer in the small Alabama town who will defend a black man facing a rape charge. As the only moral person in sight, it’s pretty obvious that Atticus is the human mockingbird. His truth ‘sings’. On some deep level, the townspeople need him as a touchstone to maintain their basic humanity.

But the story is told from the point of view of Atticus’ young daughter, Scout. She’s on a journey to becoming a mockingbird, herself. But it’s a rough ride. As we all know, people on the leading edge of human evolution tend to get crucified. Atticus comes very close to getting strung up himself. This is the story of how one small island of sanity survives in a sea of ignorance.

Fine, but so what? (I’m glad I asked that.)

If you know this blog at all, you’re just waiting for me to introduce some deep thought, so here it is. A good story promises to prove a thesis. Many of the best stories show (often unwittingly) that the natural drift of our human potential is toward knowing, understanding, and compassion. It may be a slow journey; it’s definitely not easy; and it may be tragically nipped in the bud by a dark age…but it would appear to be our destiny, nevertheless.

Most conventional stories – because they climax with a hero’s ‘growth’ – are more or less in the service of this principle. The sooner we get a grip on the concept of life’s meaning being a state of consciousness – as opposed to some high falutin ‘purpose’ – the sooner we will quit squandering this valuable lifetime.

Now…I’m off to the library. What other books did I miss in high school?

Nothing but the Truth…

Wednesday, January 27th, 2010

Am I obsessing? Once again I’m talking about that moment late in a story when battle weary heroes are forced into a ‘die or wake up’ situation. The waking up is called an ‘epiphany’. People are never the same after that. The protagonist is now equipped with the knowledge and power to bring the story to its conclusion.

Previously (”Fight for the right to see”, Dec, 7, 2009), I described this climax in terms of climbing a mountain, from which heights the hero is presented with a more expansive view of their world. They see more; they’re wiser now; outmoded principles can fall away. The lesson would appear to be that discovering ‘truth’ is a product of struggle. Better yet, all-consuming struggle.

Otherwise there’s no story worth telling. (This is what I’m obsessing about.)

Imagine if, in the opening scene of a movie, someone accosted the protagonist in the street and told them the truth. Instructed them clearly and forcibly. That should be the end of the story, right? Wrong. We don’t expect the hero to take anything on faith. If that happened, we’d groan. We’d demand our money back. Instinctively, we know that’s not how life’s most profound lessons are learned.

Truth told to us, however sincerely, and taken on faith, isn’t satisfying at all. Let’s see how this thesis plays out in Avatar.

Sully, the film’s hero, is dropped (literally) into a situation (Planet Pandora) where we just know he’s going to have a change of heart. Once a Marine, Sully is going to soften up, fall in love, and challenge authority. We know that. Yet we stick around for another two hours of film time to experience vicariously the painfully human process of breaking down old habits so that a new understanding can take root. We know it’s going to happen, but still, this is where we get our money’s worth. In the living through hell. As they say, ‘it’s easier to die than change.’

Sully’s ultimate transformation is total. The conventional wisdom pounded into him by his military training is abandoned. Coming from a world where ‘knowledge is power’ (and where power is synonymous with gain at the expense of others), Sully learns a more profound type of ‘knowing’. Pandoran knowledge empowers the person to understand where they fit in the cosmic scheme of things, a perspective from which all good things flow.

So, what’s my point? That the power of a story to nourish us depends on a struggle to uncover the truth. And that truth is always some kind of ‘knowing’. And, finally, that ever-expanding knowing (not knowledge) would appear to be our noble destiny.

Fight for the right to see

Monday, December 7th, 2009

We’re talking about books and movies helping us to ‘see the truth’. At least, that’s what’s happening to the protagonist during the story’s climax – she’s seeing the big picture. She’s starting to see the truth of her life.

What more can a person ask for? From truth springs appropriate action. Our lives can’t really go too far wrong after that.

So, why don’t we fight for these kinds of experiences in our own lives? One thing we can do is read books and watch movies more critically. We can anticipate and then identify the sea-change the hero is going through. But what about ourselves? We’re the heroes of our own lives, aren’t we? How can we fight for a better view of things in our own lives?

Some people climb mountains. Literally, they do. They love the awesome view from the top. Some call it a religious experience. Well, there are other activities less physically dangerous than mountain climbing that can provide a vantage point for glimpsing a bigger picture. Truly religious people know all about it.

They fight for their insights by going inside. Monks get very good at it. Is it really that much different than the forced introspection of a protagonist faced with a ‘change or die’ moment?

We’ll talk more about this in the coming weeks and months.

Climax — Pearls of Wisdom

Sunday, November 29th, 2009

We were talking about living vicariously through a fictional character’s struggle and transformation. I was suggesting that this is exactly why we fork over the price of admission to see a film or buy a book.

In ROXY (Tradewind Books, 2009), the 17 year old protagonist confronts her demons in the land of Zorba – Greece. Roxy’s special boogeyman is a perceived curse. She believes that she’s next in a succession of women in her family to be denied the love of a family. The culprit is her estranged grandfather. This belief must die, or there’s no story worth telling.

We sense very quickly – once Roxy arrives on the island of Corfu – that she is onto something that will alter the past. This is what we’ve paid for – the opportunity to anticipate correctly the sea change she’ll go through. It’s obvious from the first time she meets her grandfather in Greece that she yearns for ‘family’. We also know that Roxy’s worldview is largely based upon her reverence for her long-dead grandmother. And that it would be a huge mistake for anyone to denigrate her memory. Fast-forward to the climax.

Don’t worry, I’m not going to spoil the ending; it’s not necessary to do so. Let’s just say that if I were directing “Roxy”, the movie, I’d deploy the slow zoom (see previous post regarding Moonstruck) into Roxy’s face as the truth dawns upon her. Her heart’s most precious touchstone may be a big lie.

As Roxy mentally assembles the horrific evidence – reluctantly, disastrously – her worldview is going to have to be radically altered. We watch her expression as the truth usurps her former beliefs. The grisly truth is struggling to reboot her rewired organizm. For a moment during this psychic ‘changing of the guard’ there is chaos and confusion. The implications run too deep for any mortal to accept all at once. Plenty of story follows, therefore, more crises and tears, since time is needed for the truth to take its rightful place in the true history of Roxy’s life.

Earlier, I used the phrase ‘sea change’ to refer to the outcome of Roxy’s ordeal. The dictionary defines it as ‘a radical or even mystical change’. ‘Sea change’, it turns out, comes from Shakespeare’s Tempest, generally considered to be set on the island of Corfu. The impish Ariel sings:

Full fathom five thy father lies;
Of his bones are coral made;
Those are pearls that were his eyes:
Nothing of him that doth fade
But doth suffer a sea-change
Into something rich and strange.
Sea-nymphs hourly ring his knell.

Shakespeare might be suggesting that in ‘depth’ lies the power of personal transformation. Bones turned to coral, eyes to pearls. At the climax – the deepest part of the story – a good character will take the plunge, even risk death, if there’s no other way to emerge ‘rich and strange’.

 

 

 

The Climax — change or die

Friday, November 27th, 2009

How and why do good stories compel us as they do? For the answer, let’s cut to the chase – actually it would be shortly after the obligatory chase scene – to that part of the story where, finally, the source of meaning and satisfaction is found – at the climax.

When we buy a ticket to a serious movie, we’re really paying to watch vicariously as characters suffer through life-changing ordeals. The protagonist is typically forced into a dead-end where she must in some way become super-human or die. We know this moment is coming. We count on it. Most stories are designed so that we can participate by anticipating this showdown.

In Moonstruck, for instance – Loretta (Cher) is destined to ditch her emotionally flat fiancé in favour of his much more feral brother, Ronnie (Nicholas Cage). We all know what’s coming. Loretta’s lonely little life as a bean-counter is characterized by a lack of romantic courage. She seems content to stick to the puny path of least resistance, but you better believe she’s going to abandon it or audiences will be howling for their money back. It’s only a matter of a few stormy encounters with Ronnie before Loretta connects with her long-lost passion. We don’t know exactly what she’s thinking, but Zorba the Greek’s famous speech is probably dead on: “Life is trouble – only death is not – to be alive is to undo your belt and look for trouble.”

What Ronnie said was this: “Loretta, I love you. Not like they told you love is. Love don’t make things nice, it ruins everything, it breaks your heart. We’re not here to make things perfect. Snowflakes are perfect. The stars are perfect. Not us. We are here to ruin ourselves and break our hearts and love the wrong people and die!”

Wow.

Now, here’s where viewers find their satisfaction – we’re watching Loretta up on the screen, making up her mind – to follow Ronnie to his bed, or go home. Her fiancé is returning tomorrow. She’s shivering in the cold; they’ve just been to the opera; she looks like a million bucks. The director (Norman Jewison) calls for a slow zoom into her face. He’s unashamedly milking the scene because he knows the audience has paid the price of admission to identify with this ‘arresting’ moment. The director is arresting the moment cinematically, slowing it down so that we can appreciate just how damn hard it is for anyone to permit their organizm to be rewired for a brand new way of being. When it comes to ‘change or die’, most people prefer the latter. Cutting the ties that bind us to our old habits is a death. That’s why we applaud and cry and join book clubs in order to discuss what we find so hard to do in real life. 

In my next dispatch, we’ll take a look at the climax in ROXY.  I know, I know…the anticipation is killing you.